Here's an oddity. This postcard was probably printed in about 1915, but it shows a street scene from 1850. It really does look as if a very early photograph was used as the basis for the card, which was then colored and embellished. I've never seen anything quite like it.
There is still a Galt House in Louisville. It is the official hotel of the Kentucky Derby and is now a 25-story building with 1,300 rooms. I don't think it's in exactly the same location either. it looks like it may have migrated across the street.
Here's the back of the card:
Friday, September 3, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Very strange card indeed. Pretty sure I stayed in a hotel on Main Street, Louisville several years ago on a work trip - needless to say it looked nothing like this.
ReplyDeleteLooks more like a piece of folk art than a post card, I like the bright yellow carriage though!
ReplyDeletehehee. Downtown Louisville is a really awful caricature of this now... It's always been a Dead ZOne.
ReplyDeletethis looks like a little piece of art from someone who was quite creative.
ReplyDelete& thank you for your comforting comments about Priscilla. She's home now & doing well.
: )
It's fun to go over the image and make guesses as to what is drawn and what was on the original photo. "Galt House" sign looking a bit hand lettered. Street lamp on right not real. It's like one of those hidden pictures. There are 10 fake items in this image. Can you find them?
ReplyDeletehbxx,
ReplyDeleteYou may change your mind when I post another card of downtown Louisville next week.
"Alex, I'll take Literary Characters for $1000."
ReplyDelete"And the answer is: 'Her detractors said the protagonist of this famous 1957 novel was named after author Ayn Rand struggled with a bout of diarrhea in Louisville, Kentucky's Galt House john.'"
Sorry, Christine, my sixth grade class clown got the better of me. Jack/Youngstown
What a wonderful postcard! The casual capture of the different vehicles is so interesting.
ReplyDeleteWow, very bizarre! A great find.
ReplyDeleteWith humility, I withdraw the word, "always".
ReplyDelete